Topics in this digest:
1a. Re: GREAT,SANDIPJI GREAT,
From: Sandip Solanki
2a. Re: Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
From: Umesh Toshniwal
2b. Re: Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
From: Sandip Solanki
3a. Meeting with CMD
From: lucky_nagaur
3b. Re: Meeting with CMD
From: Sandip Solanki
4a. Re: STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
From: lalit singh
5a. Fw: [TTABSNL] jto exam
From: asha sharma
6a. Re: jto exam
From: lalit singh
7a. Re: EVERY BODY MUST READ
From: jeevan babu
Messages
________________________________________________________________________
1a. Re: GREAT,SANDIPJI GREAT,
Posted by: "Sandip Solanki" sandip4net@yahoo.co.in sandip4net
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:32 am ((PST))
DEAR,
It is not the question of SACRIFICE at all. Nobody is loosing anything. Here the case is to GET something or not. It was never our right in BSNL ( A THIRD CLASS MANAGEMENT ).
And the wait is of no use. The case will take 2 to 3 years. How can you say some months. Also there is no guarantee of output.
All who are in favour of filing a CASE know that it is of no sense. Lawyer told that it will take 2 to 3 years in CASE. Then after this much time all will be eligible with 10 years condition. Then what is the meaning of SNATTA formation in 2004 ?
In Gujarat I met the Lawyer with some ineligible ones ( and not alone ). The decision of not filing the case was their own. I do not believe in misguiding members like.... My members are also ENGINEERS, they generaly do not get misguided by anyone like others.
They have heard everything from Lawyer and then decided not to go for Court on their own. Don't tell that I make them understand. Don't think personal. Think the SOLUTION. If court case would be the solution then it was me to file the case first. I assure you.
The situations are now so disturbed that if I say something, WORDS are counted of an ELIGIBLE, and that is why no one think on it seriously. Some friends who know me personally have understood the situation not others...
Otherwise our senior Leaders would have not been criticised at Delhi.
Think on the situation and think for the solution not to take steps haphazardly.
Thanks..
Er. Sandip Solanki
C.C., SNATTA,
Rajkot - GUJARAT
09429244440
--- On Fri, 19/2/10, Ttagzp <ttagzp@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: Ttagzp <ttagzp@yahoo.com>
Subject: [TTABSNL] GREAT,SANDIPJI GREAT,
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, 19 February, 2010, 5:41 PM
DEAR SANDIPJI
how much it would have been better to see in history of snatta
that if eligible friends say-that case will be filed and noneligible say that no,we will not file case for you,for unity of snatta,but misfortunate it could not happened due to some excited started to cry.
but great,great your explaination power and nice to see
you have made understand your 16 friends and they understood.
really sir,now i belive in greatness.
you could not sacrifice only some month for them{it seem bsnl have offered chair,chair of jto,come and sit quick,and it seem some eligible
friend have become lawyer to judge court case ground}
but they became ready.really great.there name should be taken.
now pls explain us why we should not go in court?why we should sacrifice but not by you.and dear friend attack on thought of case by democrative way,not rudely and never attack on paticular person.it will
start polraization which is not good for any tta.and again explain us
perhaps we may get power to sacrifice.
waiting your answer eagerly.
YOUR NONELIGIBLE FRIEND-NARAYAN RAI
9451343700,GHAZIPUR ,UPEAST
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/
Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2a. Re: Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
Posted by: "Umesh Toshniwal" utoshniwal_04@yahoo.co.in utoshniwal_04
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:32 am ((PST))
Dear all,
I agree with manoj and everyone should think on it seriouly in favour of SNATTA/TTA's without taking the matter personally because if this time we go to court.. definitely it will go against TTA cadre and probably no certainity about JTO LICE.
Why don't some of our friends try to understand that if JTO LICE procees gets starts then automatically every TTA wiil be eligible with in very short period and it wiil be better for all TTA's rather than going to court( A very time consuming process).
If still somebody is thinking about court case then before filling court cast just think on following seriously..
1. What about snatta chq struggle for 7 yr. eligibility for LICE?
2. What about snatta chq struggle for JTO LICE?
2. We all TTA' will definitely loose w.r.t career growth in BSNL as compare to DRJTO.
3. We are going to put ourselves again to start counting from beginning.
so dear all think on it positively, as a whole few months non-eligibilty doesn't matter against a long struggle of snatta chq. for both the issue.
Struggle for regular LICE exams...this will be beneficial for this cadre.
Regards,
Umesh Toshniwal
BSNL,Chittorgarh(Raj.)
________________________________
From: MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo.com>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 18 February, 2010 7:25:34 AM
Subject: [TTABSNL] Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com> wrote:
>From: MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com>
>Subject: Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
>To: TTAGROUPS@yahoogrou ps.com
>Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 7:00 PM
>
>
>
>
>--- On Wed, 17/2/10, MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com> wrote:
>
>
>>From: MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com>
>>Subject: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
>>To: TTAGROUPS@yahoo. com
>>Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 6:58 PM
>>
>>
>>dear all snattaians, court case should not file, as this will lengthen the procedure for becomming departmental jto. All the rajasthan ttas not ready to participate the fund for court case. so, dear manish not to make selfish because group president should not be selfish. He should think better for all. I requeted to all circles not to participate this moohim. Fight should be for regular exam after year &year. A meeting of Bharatpur was organised & make unanimously decide not to particapate the fund & support to file court case.
>>________________________________
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
>________________________________
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
________________________________
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/
Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
2b. Re: Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
Posted by: "Sandip Solanki" sandip4net@yahoo.co.in sandip4net
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:50 am ((PST))
Dear Friends !!
I hope you all know that the CASE is filed from Chhattisgadh Circle. Court has provisionally allowed all petitioners.
Now there is no meaning of discussing about weather to file CASE or not.
Let's all pray that because of CASEs ( one filed and others to be filed ), The EXAM doesn't held up.
This may be atleast done by both ELIGIBLE and INELIGIBLE.
Er. Sandip Solanki
C.C., SNATTA,
Rajkot - GUJARAT
09429244440
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, Umesh Toshniwal <utoshniwal_04@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
From: Umesh Toshniwal <utoshniwal_04@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 1:09 PM
Dear all,
I agree with manoj and everyone should think on it seriouly in favour of SNATTA/TTA's without taking the matter personally because if this time we go to court.. definitely it will go against TTA cadre and probably no certainity about JTO LICE.
Why don't some of our friends try to understand that if JTO LICE procees gets starts then automatically every TTA wiil be eligible with in very short period and it wiil be better for all TTA's rather than going to court( A very time consuming process).
If still somebody is thinking about court case then before filling court cast just think on following seriously..
1. What about snatta chq struggle for 7 yr. eligibility for LICE?
2. What about snatta chq struggle for JTO LICE?
2. We all TTA' will definitely loose w.r.t career growth in BSNL as compare to DRJTO.
3. We are going to put ourselves again to start counting from beginning.
so dear all think on it positively, as a whole few months non-eligibilty doesn't matter against a long struggle of snatta chq. for both the issue.
Struggle for regular LICE exams...this will be beneficial for this cadre.
Regards,
Umesh Toshniwal
BSNL,Chittorgarh( Raj.)
From: MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Thu, 18 February, 2010 7:25:34 AM
Subject: [TTABSNL] Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com>
Subject: Fw: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
To: TTAGROUPS@yahoogrou ps.com
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 7:00 PM
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: MANOJ KUMAR <mnjttuman@yahoo. com>
Subject: Is this punishment for ttas completing 8 years of service?
To: TTAGROUPS@yahoo. com
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 6:58 PM
dear all snattaians, court case should not file, as this will lengthen the procedure for becomming departmental jto. All the rajasthan ttas not ready to participate the fund for court case. so, dear manish not to make selfish because group president should not be selfish. He should think better for all. I requeted to all circles not to participate this moohim. Fight should be for regular exam after year &year. A meeting of Bharatpur was organised & make unanimously decide not to particapate the fund & support to file court case.
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/
Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3a. Meeting with CMD
Posted by: "lucky_nagaur" lakshya2001@gmail.com lucky_nagaur
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:32 am ((PST))
dear friends,
as per AIGETOA website, Agenda meeting of AIGETOA with CMD, BSNL has been fixed on 25th Feb 2010. Why don't our association writes to CMD regarding fixing of a meeting, so that we may convey our concerns to the Hon'ble CMD sir. According to me it can be much convincing rather than a meeting with DIR (HRD).Hope Chq will consider the suggestion.
Thanks,
Sushil Choudhary
DS, Nagaur-Rajasthan
Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
3b. Re: Meeting with CMD
Posted by: "Sandip Solanki" sandip4net@yahoo.co.in sandip4net
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:50 am ((PST))
Dear Sushil,
I think you are not continously in touch with your Circle bearers. CHQ already met to CMD for the issue before. CMD had assured favourable too. But they are saying due to legal hurdles it can not be done anything for relaxation.
Er. Sandip Solanki
C.C., SNATTA,
Rajkot - GUJARAT
09429244440
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, lucky_nagaur <lakshya2001@gmail.com> wrote:
From: lucky_nagaur <lakshya2001@gmail.com>
Subject: [TTABSNL] Meeting with CMD
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 1:24 PM
dear friends,
as per AIGETOA website, Agenda meeting of AIGETOA with CMD, BSNL has been fixed on 25th Feb 2010. Why don't our association writes to CMD regarding fixing of a meeting, so that we may convey our concerns to the Hon'ble CMD sir. According to me it can be much convincing rather than a meeting with DIR (HRD).Hope Chq will consider the suggestion.
Thanks,
Sushil Choudhary
DS, Nagaur-Rajasthan
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/
Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4a. Re: STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
Posted by: "lalit singh" lalitbsingh@yahoo.co.uk lalitbsingh
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:32 am ((PST))
Dear Pandey Ji
No one will be disagree with u and it is also a very good suggestion. as for as the relaxation is concerned as u coded " If ANY JUNIOR IS ELIGIBLE FOR ANY LICE EXAMINATION THEN SENIORS ARE
ALREADY ALLOWED AND MAX RELAXATION CAN BE DONE BY TWO YEARS" but form where it is as i know in sde rr it is only one year relaxation. Though by way of means it will be helpful for so many TTAs. Kindly provide that guideline for two year relaxation. Once again i welcome your valuable suggestion.
Thanks and regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, A.K.Pandey <akpforms@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
From: A.K.Pandey <akpforms@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 16:12
Dear friends,
Going through various emails, it looks like a " SANGRAM CHIDA HAIN Non Eligible and Eligibile Snattians Mein, which is not at all Healthy for all " , i do suggest few things below which UNDESIRED AT THIS TIME but i think it is right time to say , that we all agree
1. No snattian should go for STAY for LICE JTO Examination and No body i think is planning.
2. Each circle should go for their respective CAT only for Eligibility, not for cut off date (It will be selfwishness in respect for rest TTAs who are not Eligible) as there is a constitutional provision " If ANY JUNIOR IS ELIGIBLE FOR ANY LICE EXAMINATION THEN SENIORS ARE ALREADY ALLOWED AND MAX RELAXATION CAN BE DONE BY TWO YEARS". As we all know that our seniority in SSAs is decided by who scored in higher marks in particular batch of recruitment year rather than who get training first or who joined first in SSA . This is most valid ground where Ineligible TTAs will get PROVISIONAL Permission for examination , result may be awaited till FINAL DECISION COMES.
In this case noone is going to loose whether Eligible or Non Eligible. Try maxamium Juniors to file the examination forms no one should left.
3. Other factor must be produced to CAT like in JAO Examination which held hardly three month ago , mgmt provide both side five year relaxation then through COURT it may asked why not this time for 2 year relaxation single side only.
JUSTICE in INDIA generally comes late so it is the problem of lenghty procedures of court not the employees so LICE Conduction should continue with all eligible and noneligible TTAs of same Batch, No one should remark personally BECAUSE THIS IS PAIN OF PERSONS STAND UP ONE SIDE OF TABLE & REST OF AT THE OTHER SIDE. Cheer Up Guys and Every one should busy in Exam , no one is thinking seriously about exam which is also most critical.
A.K.Pandey
TTA- Sawai Madhopur(Raj. )
--- On Tue, 16/2/10, Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo. com> wrote:
From: Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo. com>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Date: Tuesday, 16 February, 2010, 17:19
Dear Sampad,
Nice to read ur mail. Whatever u r saying thats correct , but , if a stay is asked for only then.
Let me tell you my dear friend that nobody is opting for a stay. What we want is that all should be allowed
to atleast appear in the exam. We all have been recruited in the organisation against the same recruitment year. What change the date of joining is the way the procedure was handled by the particular circles/SSAs.
Some were fast and some slow, coz of which ur and mine joining dates are not same. So for the organisations mistake why should non eligible TTAs lose. Can the management assure with the next exam date? Will it conduct the exam at the earliest? How many vacancies do u expect to be left for non-eligible TTAs . Lets not forget that other than DR also there are other candidates who are eligible for the exam.
Lets be fair. Ofcourse stay should not be asked for , and nobody is going to do that, but let us make all our friends appear the exam.
regards,
Santosh J. Devadiga.
TTA CDMA MSC,
Nasik.
9422268970.
From: sampad_swain2002 <sampad_swain2002@ yahoo.co. in>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Mon, 15 February, 2010 9:58:41 PM
Subject: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
How Filing a court case for JTO LICE will become a Boomerang decision for all the TTAs.
- It is high time that we should take our decisions very cautiously & patiently with using our intelligence.
- Any marginal error at this niche of time will pull us back again from where we have started our long marathon journey.
- Just learn a lesson from the story of two dogs fighting for a loaf of bread thrown to them. At last not only none of them failed to eat that but also lost their blood by hurting each other & a third person (monkey) was taken away that bread.
- Moral of the above story can be easily understood by everybody.
- Most vital points we should not forget
• Some body is waiting for this type of mistake from our side.
• MT exam postponed due to the various court cases.Every case was there to make the petitioners eligible for the exam subject to the outcome of judgment still the exam was postponed.
- We
know very well that BSNL management is going to conduct this exam forcefully though management has shown his initial hindrance by not stopping the diversion procedure & also very unwilling to reduce the service condition to 7 years.
- If at this time falling under a greed of more & more we will do the court case then there is no doubt that BSNL management & the diversion beneficiaries will take the undue advantages out of that.
IMPORTANT- If the court case will result the most expected STAY,then
it will prove to be as a curse upon those Sr. Dr.TTAs who
are fighting for this cause from last 7 years and going to
compete about 8 years.
SAMPAD KUMAR SWAIN
TTA AXE-10 L-1 TAX CUTTACK
09437066577
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
Messages in this topic (7)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
5a. Fw: [TTABSNL] jto exam
Posted by: "asha sharma" brijesh_singh10000@yahoo.com brijesh_singh10000
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:51 am ((PST))
----- Forwarded Message ----
From: asha sharma <brijesh_singh10000@yahoo.com>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Cc: brijesh_singh10000@yahoo.com
Sent: Sat, 20 February, 2010 9:23:57 AM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto exam
its sounds tooo....... negative , yaa i am , lets enjoy the negativity of ours fate , our efforts and offcourse our integrity.
every body is meant for himself and our big boss knows it very well , ok so what to do ?
actually we cant do any thing , oops its not a solution , we must do some thing ,actually i should say i should do some thing . why?
we were never 'we' but always 'i' start from the begining , actually helpless people always think of we.
once upon a time we realise the power of 'we' , every were we roared 'we', 'they ' found sign of power in it so they use very simple technic that i have mentioned earlier 'every body is meant for himself'.
any way we should not loose hope and lets enjoy the negativity of ours fate.
thanking you .
BRIJESH SINGH
TTA CDMA
VADODARA
9408148684
________________________________
From: lalit singh <lalitbsingh@ yahoo.co. uk>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Fri, 19 February, 2010 12:35:41 PM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto exam
dear vaishakh soni ji
why r u people targeting mr manish as he is just bearing the responsibility given by the CEC of snatta as on 07th feb in delhi cec decided for the court case and made mr manish as the chairman legal committee to file court case and by targeting mr. manish u people just now showing that your personal eligibility is more valuable than the decision of cec snatta. For association working always any decision will harmful for some one but association will look for the future of masses not for only few people.
regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo. co.in> wrote:
>From: vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo. co.in>
>Subject: [TTABSNL] jto exam
>To: "TTA
> BSNL" <TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com>
>Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 22:18
>
>
>>
>
>
>
> >
>
>
>>
>
>the decision of court case by manish ( chq) will be very unfortunate dicison for SNATTA who are contuneous fighting for one and only one agenda to become JTO in less than time of 10 years. As per 7 years eligilbilty, most of TTAs complted 8 years and due to court case all will be completed more than 10 years. then my question is why we made assosiation, what was need to be unite and fighting for our prime demand.
>
>>this is step toward to break unity of SNATTA,
>>ya this decision definately beneficial to FNTO and NFTE. and they really want same.and their work will be easy because our people ready to help them to linger JTO exam.
>>
>>If Non eligibility happened in case of any other TTA instead of president Manish Samadhya Should the Court Case be filed by SNATTA,CHQ ?
>
>>-Vaishakh Soni
>> B.E.(Electronics)
>
>> 9426724484
>
>>The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo. com/
>
________________________________
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/
Messages in this topic (11)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
6a. Re: jto exam
Posted by: "lalit singh" lalitbsingh@yahoo.co.uk lalitbsingh
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:08 am ((PST))
Dear soni ji
Any way we are also not in faour to held up the exam procedure but want to be a part of that exam but only the option is court caseby which we can get an opportunity. we are fighting here for the progression of our carrior not think to retire as tta. as for as management decision it is only a lollypop to conduct the exam as if they are intrested for 5 year why they had not done it so. in jto rr before 2001 it was only 5 year for degree holder and 6 year for the high school or matriculation. So pl try to understand us we are not against u r planning to retire as tta but definately want to be a part of this exam.
regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)
--- On Sat, 20/2/10, vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
From: vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto exam
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, 20 February, 2010, 15:27
Mr lalit ji
i read each and every mail posted by you.
each mail given good logic. and i think you have completed almost 7 years in BSNL. and suppose you miss this opportunity my some months or days.
due to this case, u think, u become winner and you get opportunity to seat in exam, but these almost after 2-3 years later and that time you will be complete almost 10 years. good na... the why we found SNATTA. without association also it were possible.
again same things repeated after 3 years, because that time also some were not eligible in next recrutee batches. they also follow same path and again delayed 3 years and same producere is going on endless.
these is good idea to retire as TTA from BSNL.
i heard that management promised that they will take next exam just after this one and also agreed to 5 years elligiblity.
agian my best wish for those freind who are not eligible. and try another way except courtcase because this not proper way to achieve goal. you are not outsider from BSNL as well SNATTA. we are also praying for you becaseu if you are eligible, definately we are.
YOU DONT THINK WE ELIGIBLE OPPOSE YOU, BUT OPPOSE DECISION OF COURT CASE.
WHICH IS HARM FUL FOR BOTH ELIGIBLE AND NON ELIGIBLE.
AND UNITY OF ASSOCIATION.
-Vaishakh Soni
B.E.(Electronics)
9426724484
From: lalit singh <lalitbsingh@ yahoo.co. uk>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Fri, 19 February, 2010 12:35:41 PM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto exam
dear vaishakh soni ji
why r u people targeting mr manish as he is just bearing the responsibility given by the CEC of snatta as on 07th feb in delhi cec decided for the court case and made mr manish as the chairman legal committee to file court case and by targeting mr. manish u people just now showing that your personal eligibility is more valuable than the decision of cec snatta. For association working always any decision will harmful for some one but association will look for the future of masses not for only few people.
regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo. co.in> wrote:
From: vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo. co.in>
Subject: [TTABSNL] jto exam
To: "TTA BSNL" <TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com>
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 22:18
the decision of court case by manish ( chq) will be very unfortunate dicison for SNATTA who are contuneous fighting for one and only one agenda to become JTO in less than time of 10 years. As per 7 years eligilbilty, most of TTAs complted 8 years and due to court case all will be completed more than 10 years. then my question is why we made assosiation, what was need to be unite and fighting for our prime demand.
this is step toward to break unity of SNATTA,
ya this decision definately beneficial to FNTO and NFTE. and they really want same.and their work will be easy because our people ready to help them to linger JTO exam.
If Non eligibility happened in case of any other TTA instead of president Manish Samadhya Should the Court Case be filed by SNATTA,CHQ ?
-Vaishakh Soni
B.E.(Electronics)
9426724484
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo. com/
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.
Messages in this topic (11)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
7a. Re: EVERY BODY MUST READ
Posted by: "jeevan babu" jeevanbabu_68@yahoo.co.in jeevanbabu_68
Date: Sat Feb 20, 2010 4:12 am ((PST))
DEAR FRIENDS,
PLEASE DO NOT PLAY SPOIL SPORT IN THIS ISSUE.
I AM FROM 2008 BATCH. AND DEFINITELY NOT ELIGIBLE. BUT I AM SERIOUSLY WAITING TO SEE ONE SUCH EXAM IS CODUCTED AND OUR OLD FRIENDS BECOME JTOs.
BUT THIS COURT CASE IS NOT GOING TO HELP ANYONE BUT OUR OPPONENTS. SO PLEASE DONT PLAY INTO THEIR HANDS.
BY THE BY, WHO HAS DECIDED THE RELAXATION SHOULD BE 2YRS? I APPEAL TO YOU TO GO FOR 6YRS SO THAT I CAN ALSO APPEAR. IF THIS IS THE WAY EVERYBODY START THINKING, THEN NOTHING CAN HELP THIS GROUP.
JEEVANBABU
TTA
KOLLAM SSA
--- On Fri, 19/2/10, bhabani mohapatra <bs_mo2004@yahoo.com> wrote:
From: bhabani mohapatra <bs_mo2004@yahoo.com>
Subject: [TTABSNL] EVERY BODY MUST READ
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, 19 February, 2010, 6:37 PM
Dear Lalit
what you have written about Manish that is right, but thing is that what the CEC had decided that matters for those who are waiting since 9Yrs of punishment.Just you think we created a association named SNATTA for to arrange a LICE for JTO as soon as possible but now what we are doing ,we are just opposing for what we have formed SNATTA.
Coming to the point again I want to ask all my friends that before taking the decision for going to court for this 7 to 5 yrs relaxation whether you have asked the founder members , taken their opinion, taken their suggestion ITS A BIG NO for this question.
You people are just forgetting those who are waiting for more than 8yrs, can you assure me for this 7 to 5 Yrs relaxation if YES then please try for 4 YRS so that most of us will be eligible .
But try to think in a positive manner let the exam should start then again we will fight for the relaxation in the coming session as well as to conduct exam regularly as some of our friends as all-ready crossed 6Yrs.
Again I want to say PLZ DO NT MISS LEAD OTHERS , BCOZ WE ARE ALSO GUESSING THAT SOME OF US WANT THAT , LIKE DOING THIS TYPE OF MISS GUIDANCE THEY WILL MAKE THEM ELIGIBLE AFTER 6 to 7 MONTHS of making the process delay , ITS TOO BAD
GO WITH SNATTA , GO WITH SNATTA FOUNDATION MOTO , GO FOR ALL
with warm regards
BHABANI SHANKAR MOHAPATRA
ORISSA
9437018881
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, lalit singh <lalitbsingh@ yahoo.co. uk> wrote:
From: lalit singh <lalitbsingh@ yahoo.co. uk>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto exam
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 12:35 PM
dear vaishakh soni ji
why r u people targeting mr manish as he is just bearing the responsibility given by the CEC of snatta as on 07th feb in delhi cec decided for the court case and made mr manish as the chairman legal committee to file court case and by targeting mr. manish u people just now showing that your personal eligibility is more valuable than the decision of cec snatta. For association working always any decision will harmful for some one but association will look for the future of masses not for only few people.
regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)
--- On Wed, 17/2/10, vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo. co.in> wrote:
From: vaishakh soni <vaishakhs@yahoo. co.in>
Subject: [TTABSNL] jto exam
To: "TTA BSNL" <TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com>
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 22:18
the decision of court case by manish ( chq) will be very unfortunate dicison for SNATTA who are contuneous fighting for one and only one agenda to become JTO in less than time of 10 years. As per 7 years eligilbilty, most of TTAs complted 8 years and due to court case all will be completed more than 10 years. then my question is why we made assosiation, what was need to be unite and fighting for our prime demand.
this is step toward to break unity of SNATTA,
ya this decision definately beneficial to FNTO and NFTE. and they really want same.and their work will be easy because our people ready to help them to linger JTO exam.
If Non eligibility happened in case of any other TTA instead of president Manish Samadhya Should the Court Case be filed by SNATTA,CHQ ?
-Vaishakh Soni
B.E.(Electronics)
9426724484
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo. com/
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/
Messages in this topic (11)
Please visit us at www.SNATTA.org for more details.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TTABSNL/
<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TTABSNL/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
TTABSNL-normal@yahoogroups.com
TTABSNL-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
TTABSNL-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment