Dear Chandan
You have given a very good explanation of the situation.
Hope our friends do understand the obvious explanation given by you.
Dharmendra Verma
G.S. SNATTA
--- In
TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com, CHANDAN KUMAR SAMAL <chandan_bsnl@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> 1. Since X is rank 1 & Z is rank 3 in my example, and both got the same rectt year, that's why I told that X will be senior.BUT I am sorry I may be wrong coz there will be the element of --marks in Induction training-- which finally decides the seniorty for a particular rectt year.
>
> 2. As discuused over phone with u, we can always fight for this cut off date. And as you have suggested 3 probable considertion for cut off date, i feel that while cosidering the cutoff date ur 3rd point --the result date-- is out of question. and the 2nd point--the exam date-- in departmental exams normally the exam dt is not declared beforehand coz there will be many hurdles and it may be postponed many times. so if they consider that as cut off date everytime it is postponed there will be more people eligible. so the last one the date of notification is most feaisble as cut off date and is unbiased also.
>
> Be United and of course we can fight for that, but keep in mind whatever be the date decided there will be people on both sides of the border. and few will be eligible marginally and few will lose marginally, and nobody will be eager to delay the exam so that few more people can be accomodated. so on this point it will be very difficult to make people united & struggle.
>
> But it is too early to discuss on these topics, we will decides neutrally as the situation arises. Don't worry, now start studying
>
> bye
> Chandan
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: nitin_pohare <nitin_pohare@ ...>
> To:
TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com> Sent: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009 9:16:17 AM
> Subject: [TTABSNL] Re: query regarding eligibility .......(Confusion)
>
>
> Hi Chandan
> How are you ?
> Very good Clearance given BY YOU (as always...Great. .GUY)
> but still I have some confusion
>
> 1. In your example you said Z is Junior to X ,
> Please furthur clarify How?
> ------------ --Your Example ------------ --------- --------- --------
> 1. suppose X joined in 2002(JAN to JUNE), and he secured rank 1
> so at the most his rectt year will be 2002+7=2009
>
> 2. suppose Y joined in 2001(JAN to JUNE) and he secured rank 2.
> so at the most his rectt year will be 2001+7=2008
>
> 3 suppose Z joined in 2001(JUL to DEC) and he secured rank 3. so
> at the most his rectt year will be 2002+7=2009 and he will be
> junior to X.
> ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
> 2.Every time only two dates are considered as CUT-OFF Date i.e.
> 1)If Exam Conducted after July(from July - Dec) then 01-July.
> 2)IF exam conducted after Jan (From Jan- June) then 01-Jan.
> So it might possbile that some people may miss the train by few yards
> as mostly Traing Date Falls after 01-Jan or 01-July might be 1 day delay 5,10, or 20 days delay.
>
> As the Process of
> 1.Date of Notification
> 2.Date of Exam
> 3.Date of Result
> 4.Date of Training.
>
> are all making the person Eligible for becoming actual JTO.
> then WHAT IS THE LOGIC OF THIS Arbitary CUT OFF Date
>
> Cant we Fight AGAINST IT?
>
> Because he may loose years just because of few short DAYS.
>
> CUT OF DATE SHOULD BE EITHER
> 1.THE DATE OF ACTUAL NOTIFICATION
> 2.THE DATE OF EXAM
> 3.THE DATE OF RESULT
> (WHEN IN TRUE SCENCE HE BECOME JTO OR CAN BE CALLED AS JTO)
>
> PLEASE CLARIFY THE ABOVE ........
>
> With regards...
>
> Nitin Pohare
> (NASIK MAHARASHTRA)
> (9422279640)
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! recommends that you upgrade to the new and safer Internet Explorer 8.
http://downloads. yahoo.com/ in/internetexplo rer/>
No comments:
Post a Comment