From: deepak_bsnlktr <deepak_bsnlktr@
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups
Sent: Tuesday, 25 August, 2009 8:01:17 PM
Subject: [TTABSNL] Re: query regarding eligibility
Congratulations and thanks to each and every one associated with this great triumph in achieving this milestone for us.
dear chandanji
have u any information that which circle has counted the training period in the total service? is there any standard rule regarding counting of total service?
pls help
deepak kumar
9431610399
--- In TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com, CHANDAN KUMAR SAMAL <chandan_bsnl@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi
> As far as my knowledge is concerned the following may happen in our case : (I am taking the example of 7 year condition)
>
> 1. Every one with 7 years of actual service will be eligible for appearing in the exam(that means he must be having 7 years of service on 1st JULY of the year, the exam is notified). most probably trng period will NOT be counted.(but in case of JTO to SDE LDCE in 2007 some circles used the rectt year e. g. 2001 or 2002 like this to count the total service.). If this happens in our case that would be most beneficial and hence irrespective of training everyone who come through the one particular advertisement, will be eligible. in BSNL every circle interprets the rules as per there understanding hence be in touch to get the most advantages.
>
> Now let us consider the worst case, suppose dept considered the actual service from the date of joining as TTA,
>
> 1. suppose X joined in 2002(JAN to JUNE), and he secured rank 1. so at the most his rectt year will be 2002+7=2009
>
> 2. suppose Y joined in 2001(JAN to JUNE) and he secured rank 2. so at the most his rectt year will be 2001+7=2008
>
> 3 suppose Z joined in 2001(JUL to DEC) and he secured rank 3. so at the most his rectt year will be 2002+7=2009 and he will be junior to X.
>
> all the posts from 2000 to the year of exam will be counted. suppose there are not sufficient qualified people for a particular year then the balance posts will be carried forward to the next rectt year and this will continue (this process although unusal but was adopted in JTO to SDE LDCE in 2007)
>
> it as per my understanding. correct me if I am wrong. I am trying to collect some more info. will mail as soon as I got to know
>
> Bye
> Chandan
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: VIKAS KUMAR GUPTA <vikas8bsnl@ ...>
> To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
> Sent: Tuesday, 25 August, 2009 1:29:38 PM
> Subject: [TTABSNL] query regarding eligibility
>
>
> dear friends,
>
> We are very near to acieving our first target.The final notification may be out in a couple of weeks.
>
> I have some confusion and a query regarding the vaccancies and the eligibility. Suppose after one time relaxation 7 years is lowered to 5 years.Last time LDCE was held in the year 2000 for tha vaccancies calculated till 1999.So if the examinations are notified then it would be for the commulative vaccancies calculated from 1999 to till date.Suppose If some one has joined in the year say 2002,then will he be eligible for all the vaccancies for which the LDCE is conducted irrespective of the vaccancy year or will he be eligible for tha vaccancies which are lying vaccant after 2007(2002+5 years)?
>
> I think all the TTAs who have completed the qualifying years(5 years,lets suppose it happens)will be eligible for all the vaccancies calculated on the date of notification of examination. In this scenario all have a chance to get promoted to JTO.
>
> share your knowledge on this matter.
>
> vikas kr gupta
> 9471590026,ranchi, jkd
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> See the Web's breaking stories, chosen by people like you. Check out Yahoo! Buzz.
>
>
>
> Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here http://cricket. yahoo.com
>
Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment