From: nitin_pohare <nitin_pohare@
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups
Sent: Wednesday, 26 August, 2009 9:16:17 AM
Subject: [TTABSNL] Re: query regarding eligibility .......(Confusion)
Hi Chandan
How are you ?
Very good Clearance given BY YOU (as always...Great. .GUY)
but still I have some confusion
1. In your example you said Z is Junior to X ,
Please furthur clarify How?
------------ --Your Example ------------ --------- --------- --------
1. suppose X joined in 2002(JAN to JUNE), and he secured rank 1
so at the most his rectt year will be 2002+7=2009
2. suppose Y joined in 2001(JAN to JUNE) and he secured rank 2.
so at the most his rectt year will be 2001+7=2008
3 suppose Z joined in 2001(JUL to DEC) and he secured rank 3. so
at the most his rectt year will be 2002+7=2009 and he will be
junior to X.
------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- -
2.Every time only two dates are considered as CUT-OFF Date i.e.
1)If Exam Conducted after July(from July - Dec) then 01-July.
2)IF exam conducted after Jan (From Jan- June) then 01-Jan.
So it might possbile that some people may miss the train by few yards
as mostly Traing Date Falls after 01-Jan or 01-July might be 1 day delay 5,10, or 20 days delay.
As the Process of
1.Date of Notification
2.Date of Exam
3.Date of Result
4.Date of Training.
are all making the person Eligible for becoming actual JTO.
then WHAT IS THE LOGIC OF THIS Arbitary CUT OFF Date
Cant we Fight AGAINST IT?
Because he may loose years just because of few short DAYS.
CUT OF DATE SHOULD BE EITHER
1.THE DATE OF ACTUAL NOTIFICATION
2.THE DATE OF EXAM
3.THE DATE OF RESULT
(WHEN IN TRUE SCENCE HE BECOME JTO OR CAN BE CALLED AS JTO)
PLEASE CLARIFY THE ABOVE .......
With regards...
Nitin Pohare
(NASIK MAHARASHTRA)
(9422279640)
Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here.
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
No comments:
Post a Comment