Friday, September 4, 2009

[TTABSNL] EU ONLY ASKED MT RULES

 

At the time of last verification, when we met ABHIMANU at KUMBAKONAM-TAMIL NADU, he told that "we only asked to include the Non-executive in the MT recruitment. And they have included." But now the management excluded the non-executive means which one is correct??
 
1) MANAGEMENT is playing with BSNLEU
or
2) BSNLEU is playing with TTAs.
or
3) Both are making as fools.
 
I think 3rd one is correct.
 
Regs
SNATTA, KUMBAKONAM,
TAMIL NADU
 
 


--- On Fri, 9/4/09, bsnl_chd <email13@gmail.com> wrote:

From: bsnl_chd <email13@gmail.com>
Subject: [TTABSNL] Re: against MT RR
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 5:17 PM

 


i think pinka has a good point..
pls consider this. we can make hay while the sunshine.

bandhan

--- In TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com, "pinakdas123" <pinakdas123@ ...> wrote:
>
> --- In TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com, VIKAS KUMAR GUPTA vikas8bsnl@ wrote:
> >
> > Friends,
> >  
> > This management has very wilfuly palyed the divide and rule policy again,earlier BE(elect) were not eligible,and now they have made US not eligible.
> > I think this managemnt is crap and the people who feel proud to be called ITS are bullshit,because after MT RR2007 they have come with  new MTRR2009 which is filled with several descrepancies which can be challenged in courts.
> >  
> > First of all they have excluded the non executives from this whole process,so those who are having BE nad 4 years can very well cahallenge this clause..In MTRR2007 management had no objection to our eligibility but this time they have barred us,maybe to appease DRJTOs.Earlier  a DRJTO had to compete with TTA (BE plus 4 years) ,but now they have no competition.
> > So by denying a non executive with the requisite qualifiaction to appear in MT management is denying our fundamental right of equality and equal oppurtunities in employment.
> >  
> > Secondly,as per the minutes of 15 NCM it was proposed by managemt itself that 25 percent would be made available to BE irrespective of executive and non executive,so by arbitrarily changing the RRs they have breached a kind of agreement reached upon with the recognised union.
> >  
> >  
> > Thirdly,the BSNL management has not made provisions for OBC Quota and age relaxation to OBC candidates as per the supreme court directives in this regard.
> >  
> > Fourthly as per the syllabus of MT Internal one has  to appear in papers that are taught in management schools,if the qualification is BE plus 4 years of experience then why the syllabus contains management papers instead of papers relating to our deepartment like .transmission, switching, microwave, computers, gsm,cdma, etc etc.
> >  
> > Earlier the AIGETOA was against the MTRRs but I think most of its member wouldfill up the form even if RP Sahu (GS) opposses it because no one would like to miss the golden oppurtunity.
> >  
> > So we are all alone in our fight,we have to to early whatever we have to do..If NAMBOODIRI can give guarantee that he will not let MT happen without a change in present RR then also we should not sit idle believing his words,because time is little.
> >  
> > we should start preparing to file a court case to get a stay and start collecting funds.
> >  
> > vikas kr gupta
> > 9471590026
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> >> If the technalities are in our favour then we should file a case against BSNL Managment for depriving us in MT-Internal.
>
> >Here I would like to make one point, it is my personal opinion that this is a golden opportunity to fulfill our core demand i,e, reduction of service condition for JTO internal to 5 years or less.
>
> > This is the best time to bargain for our cause.
> >Again this is my personal thinking I dont know how many will agree with me!
>
>
> Pinak Das
> 9436109780

>

__._,_.___
Please visit us at www.snatta.org
Recent Activity
Visit Your Group
Give Back

Yahoo! for Good

Get inspired

by a good cause.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___

No comments:

Post a Comment