ttabsnl94: [TTABSNL] Digest Number 1666

There are 13 messages in this issue.

Topics in this digest:

1a. Re: WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
From: G S Rajawat
1b. Re: WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
From: lalit singh

2a. Re: jto lice exam........
From: MohammedZuber Sheikh
2b. Re: jto lice exam........
From: Santosh J. Devadiga
2c. Re: jto lice exam........
From: Sandip Solanki

3. Birthday Reminder
From: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com

4. Fw: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
From: DINKAR NATH NARAIN

5a. Re: 3D chalk drawings..
From: amit gill

6. please don't go to the court
From: Deepak Kumar

7a. STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
From: devendra singh

8. Fw: Re: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
From: lalit singh

9. Fw: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........
From: lalit singh

10. Mutual transfer from Maharastra to Rajasthan/Mp/UP/Gj
From: Mahesh chand Meena

Messages
________________________________________________________________________
1a. Re: WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
Posted by: "G S Rajawat" gcsrajawat@yahoo.co.in gcsrajawat
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:10 am ((PST))

Hello friends

I am fully agreed with Mr Sandeep
solanki…. This legal way makes the whole process so much difficult that nobody
get benefited at all… every court case in history show that it linger the
process… and we cant hope for the better in coming 3-4 years…. And those who
are this time not eligible for the exams are automatically eligible for the exams
and at that time they have not found them slave to fight the exams as at time
some other cadre like TM who is BSC or MSC may go the CAT/./////and the process
is again linger on… I mean to say If management already said that they are
planning for the service condition for 5 year than for whom we are fighting…
why we are ruin our future aspect and to whom we are fighting…..

I am totally disagree with the CHQ
decision.. I am against the case. Some time later management may say that only
BE people are allowed to fight…..or some other issue...

I am here on this platform want to
say that we are stand here and every time the scenario is changed.. and at that
time we missed this opportunity.

So think calmly and not go for the
case.

This makes the whole process so much
idle that we found this no more useful at time.

And one thing more that in next
exams when management reduced the 5 years ….at that time people who are less
than 5 years service may beg to reduced the same thing.. oh shit…again
ridiculous….

We are most educated and most learnt
people in group C & D than we should behave like this..

Rest is up to you…but if the court
case make the hindrance in the way of eligible ones….than its not tolerated at
all…. We already found ourselves so much vanished than why we take so step.

Think again.

Best of luck.

Regards:- G S Rajawat B S N L ,Tonk, RajasthanINDIA 304021Cell +91-9413424883gcsrajawat@yahoo.co.in

--- On Tue, 16/2/10, Sandip Solanki <sandip4net@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

From: Sandip Solanki <sandip4net@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: [TTABSNL] WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
To: "Group" <TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, 16 February, 2010, 5:01 PM

I appeal all DRTTAs to see in the matter seriously. We will not let this chance go away.

Dear CHQ,

I hereby draw your attention to following points in regard to JTO-LICE :

1. It is to be conducted first time for DRTTAs.

2. It is the sole aim of SNATTA to remove the hurdle in the career progression of DR-TTAs.

3. It is the case where more than 1300 TTAs are eligible to give the exam.

Now regarding the court case :

1. The Lawyers are saying that it will take minimum 2 to 3 years in judgement. Then what is the meaning of Court case ? During these two years all non-eligibles will be eligible with no modification in RR also.

3. If because of court case, exam will be held then what about the eligibles ? why should they suffer more 2-3 years ?

Dir (HR) has principally agreed to permanently reduce the service condition to 5 years in presence of our President and G.S. on 08.02.2010. He also agreed to take the exam immediately after this exam is completed. The argument that this exam will be last and there will no no other exam because since last 10 years no exam has been conducted. This itself suggests that management want the qualified DRTTAs only to become JTO otherwise there were Sr TOAs (4000) eligible to sit in the exam. why not management conducted the exam then?

Heart of the matter CHQ or any other circles should not decide to file a court case, otherwise there will be a drastic situation. The exam will be stayed even if the case is filed to make all of us eligible. The fresh example of MT exam is in our view. There are 15 cases filed by variuos parties includuing DRTTAs and none of them has asked for stay. But BSNL has stopped the exam indeifintely.

Filing even a single court case will give management an upper hand over the issue as it is subjudice. Even offcg. JTOs can claim that if the same people who have filed court case against diversion then can be given relaxation by court then why in there case the diversion cannot be allowed as they have already cleared the JTO Exam. Imagine the situation there will be no vacanies left for us as they are 6000 in numbers.

So i again request the main leaders to stop the legal way.

Er. Sandip Solanki

9429244440

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads. yahoo.com/ in/internetexplo rer/

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

Messages in this topic (3)
________________________________________________________________________
1b. Re: WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
Posted by: "lalit singh" lalitbsingh@yahoo.co.uk lalitbsingh
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:20 pm ((PST))

Sir
The same question arises when snatta file a court case against diversion and that time no one come farword to say so because at that time these guys were in the list of ineligible candidates and at that time these people were contributing for the courtcase and etc with present ineligible candidates. Friends now u r saying that the processes must go but at that time management were wrong. Since the formation of bsnl its the first time that management is going to conduct the exam because of the cat decision not on its own or bsnleu or snatta and it is also very clear that after this exam in a lot of circle there will be no vacency for the next exam and without vacency how dir(hr) will be able to conduct the exam.
It is also very clear that adhoc jtos will not sit silently and will also take some steps for their rights so ultimately it is better that we should fight unitedly for the 5 year eligibility which was the sole objectives of the snatta at the time of formation of snatta and if management can change the service condition from 10 year to 7 year after filing the affidavit in cat and dir(hr) have some soft corner for the dr ttas then why he can not change this service condition to 5 year.
Friend give a second thought to your logics as when we applied for the same post in the same year and the recruitment year is same but because of the management working only few candidates got early posting and rest were faced the pain of unemployed no one come forward and now if they are taking some steps to safe guard their own rights u people talking selfishly without considering that what ever the snatta is going to do is better for the majority of the snattaians.
regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)

--- On Tue, 16/2/10, G S Rajawat <gcsrajawat@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

From: G S Rajawat <gcsrajawat@yahoo.co.in>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 16 February, 2010, 18:15

Hello friends

I am totally disagree with the CHQ
decision.. I am against the case. Some time later management may say that only
BE people are allowed to fight…..or some other issue...

I am here on this platform want to
say that we are stand here and every time the scenario is changed.. and at that
time we missed this opportunity.

So think calmly and not go for the
case.

This makes the whole process so much
idle that we found this no more useful at time.

And one thing more that in next
exams when management reduced the 5 years ….at that time people who are less
than 5 years service may beg to reduced the same thing.. oh shit…again
ridiculous….

We are most educated and most learnt
people in group C & D than we should behave like this..

Rest is up to you…but if the court
case make the hindrance in the way of eligible ones….than its not tolerated at
all…. We already found ourselves so much vanished than why we take so step.

Think again.

Best of luck.

Regards:- G S Rajawat B S N L ,Tonk, RajasthanINDIA 304021Cell +91-9413424883gcsrajawat@yahoo. co.in

--- On Tue, 16/2/10, Sandip Solanki <sandip4net@yahoo. co.in> wrote:

From: Sandip Solanki <sandip4net@yahoo. co.in>
Subject: [TTABSNL] WHY SHOULD AN "ELIGIBLE" SUFFER ?
To: "Group" <TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com>
Date: Tuesday, 16 February, 2010, 5:01 PM

I appeal all DRTTAs to see in the matter seriously. We will not let this chance go away.

Dear CHQ,

I hereby draw your attention to following points in regard to JTO-LICE :

1. It is to be conducted first time for DRTTAs.

2. It is the sole aim of SNATTA to remove the hurdle in the career progression of DR-TTAs.

3. It is the case where more than 1300 TTAs are eligible to give the exam.

Now regarding the court case :

3. If because of court case, exam will be held then what about the eligibles ? why should they suffer more 2-3 years ?

So i again request the main leaders to stop the legal way.

Er. Sandip Solanki

9429244440

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads. yahoo.com/ in/internetexplo rer/

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

Messages in this topic (3)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
2a. Re: jto lice exam........
Posted by: "MohammedZuber Sheikh" mgs_zuber197@yahoo.co.in mgs_zuber197
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:57 am ((PST))

BE ALERT
If Non eligibility happened in case of any other TTA instead of president Manish Samadhya Should the Court Case be filed by SNATTA,CHQ ? THINK IT THOUROUGHLY & Give Answers to your heart.
This COurt case is like a hurdle to our Career growth. SO Please Oppose it From the HEART.

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
2b. Re: jto lice exam........
Posted by: "Santosh J. Devadiga" sjd_4u@yahoo.com sjd_4u
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:43 pm ((PST))

regards,
Santosh J. Devadiga.
9422268970.

________________________________
From: MohammedZuber Sheikh <mgs_zuber197@yahoo.co.in>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 10:24:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........

BE ALERT

If Non eligibility happened in case of any other TTA instead of president Manish Samadhya Should the Court Case be filed by SNATTA,CHQ ? THINK IT THOUROUGHLY & Give Answers to your heart.

This COurt case is like a hurdle to our Career growth. SO Please Oppose it From the HEART.

________________________________
Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/

Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
2c. Re: jto lice exam........
Posted by: "Sandip Solanki" sandip4net@yahoo.co.in sandip4net
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:33 pm ((PST))

Dear Santosh,
I understand that Zuber might not know a particular person.

But any logic fails to explain the filing of court case. If one says that the petitioners are asking for only eligibility and not for stay then why the management stayed the MT examm. MT exam petiotioners have also asked for only eligiblity. Management stopped the exam because they can't decide on conducting the exam beacuse due to court cases their situation is now in dilemma. Suppose the exam is conduted and say x number of vacancies are available. now courts have directed to declare the result of the candiates who are eligible and hold back the result of the candidates who are petiotiones. There result will be declared say after 3 years if they win the court case. Now if all the x seats were filled up by the eligible candidates then what will happen to these petiotioners. Management thus have no otion other than staying the JTO exam on this filmsy ground. Otherwise there is no other reason to hold back the MT exam.
The person in quetion has already been told by his lawyer that it will take atleast 2 years in Court Case. What is the logic behind Court Case then ?

Talking about Drawing Lines.... What if the person says " G.S. and Ex-G.S. and Treasurer are ELIGIBLES and I am not eligible...... " what does it mean ? Not drawing lines ? Do you know that the main petitioner in the Supereme Court and Chandigarh High Court case of diversion has become DRJTO by his hard work. You are raising finger at him. Is this your integrity or your selfishness?

This is the time when Leaders should think like LEADERS and not like PERSON. The Court Case will affect the SOLE AIM OF SNATTA.

Er. Sandip Solanki
C.C., SNATTA,
Rajkot - GUJARAT
09429244440

--- On Wed, 17/2/10, Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 8:13 AM

regards,

Santosh J. Devadiga.
9422268970.

From: MohammedZuber Sheikh <mgs_zuber197@ yahoo.co. in>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 10:24:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........

BE ALERT

If Non eligibility happened in case of any other TTA instead of president Manish Samadhya Should the Court Case be filed by SNATTA,CHQ ? THINK IT THOUROUGHLY & Give Answers to your heart.

This COurt case is like a hurdle to our Career growth. SO Please Oppose it From the HEART.

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW! http://downloads.yahoo.com/in/internetexplorer/

Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
3. Birthday Reminder
Posted by: "TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com" TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:32 am ((PST))

Reminder from: TTABSNL Yahoo! Group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TTABSNL/cal

ajinkya's 1st birthday
Wednesday February 17, 2010
11:00 pm - 5:00 am
Location: mhapusa goa
Street: pattankodoli
City State Zip: kolhapur
Phone: 9403851400

Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
4. Fw: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
Posted by: "DINKAR NATH NARAIN" dnath_2006@yahoo.co.in dnath_2006
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:22 pm ((PST))

----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Sandip Solanki <sandip4net@yahoo.co.in>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 3:58:30 PM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER

RIGHT !!

# The Lawyer says : It may take 2 to 3 years for the judgement.
# Point of 2 years relaxation is not there now as eligibles are much higher than the vacancies.
# The case of cut-off date is some strong.

Dear CHQ,
If you are to extend cutoff date ( or even 2 years relaxation ) within 3 years then all non-eligibles will be automatically eligible after 3 years with this present RRs only. Then what is the outcome of court case ?
IT IS JUST TO KEEP THE ELIGIBLES AWAY FROM THE EXAM.

Stop this ... This will result in high discripiency in all DR-TTAs. It will affect to the future of next batches also ( 2007,2008 and 2009 ).
Management is ready to permanently reduce the service condition to 5 years after this exam. Filing the case we will loose all the oportunity. The new comers will have to start all the process again to reduce it from 7 to 5. They will have to waste their precious years ( as we had wasted from 2004 to 2009 ) for reducing it to 5 years.

Please think big. Think as an association.

Er. Sandip Solanki
C.C., SNATTA,
Rajkot - GUJARAT
09429244440

--- On Mon, 15/2/10, sampad_swain2002 <sampad_swain2002@ yahoo.co. in> wrote:

From: sampad_swain2002 <sampad_swain2002@ yahoo.co. in>
Subject: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Date: Monday, 15 February, 2010, 9:58 PM

How Filing a court case for JTO LICE will become a Boomerang decision for all the TTAs.

- It is high time that we should take our decisions very cautiously & patiently with using our intelligence.
- Any marginal error at this niche of time will pull us back again from where we have started our long marathon journey.
- Just learn a lesson from the story of two dogs fighting for a loaf of bread thrown to them. At last not only none of them failed to eat that but also lost their blood by hurting each other & a third person (monkey) was taken away that bread.
- Moral of the above story can be easily understood by everybody.
- Most vital points we should not forget
• Some body is waiting for this type of mistake from our side.
• MT exam postponed due to the various court cases.Every case was there to make the petitioners eligible for the exam subject to the outcome of judgment still the exam was postponed.
- We know very well that BSNL management is going to conduct this exam forcefully though management has shown his initial hindrance by not stopping the diversion procedure & also very unwilling to reduce the service condition to 7 years.
- If at this time falling under a greed of more & more we will do the court case then there is no doubt that BSNL management & the diversion beneficiaries will take the undue advantages out of that.

IMPORTANT- If the court case will result the most expected STAY,then
it will prove to be as a curse upon those Sr. Dr.TTAs who
are fighting for this cause from last 7 years and going to
compete about 8 years.

SAMPAD KUMAR SWAIN
TTA AXE-10 L-1 TAX CUTTACK
09437066577

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo. com/

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
5a. Re: 3D chalk drawings..
Posted by: "amit gill" amitgill2712@yahoo.co.in amitgill2712
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:25 pm ((PST))

I think this is one of the best mails i've ever seen..........

thanks Pravin

--- On Mon, 15/2/10, pravin masram <pravin_j_masram@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: pravin masram <pravin_j_masram@yahoo.com>
Subject: [TTABSNL] 3D chalk drawings..
To: "deepti aasrkar" <deepti_mirror@rediffmail.com>, "Mukesh bele" <mukesh.bele@gmail.com>, "manisha dhurve" <manisha_dhurve@yahoo.com>, "parag gawande" <paragrgawande@redifefmail.com>, "yogesh honmane" <yograjmane@rediffmail.com>, "yogesh honmane" <yogesh_honmane@synytelinc.com>, "shraddha kakade" <shraddha.d.kakade@gmail.com>, "Umesh w. Kawalkar" <uwkawalkar@gmail.com>, "ponu kove" <pornimakove@yahoo.in>, "kusuma m" <ganesha.kusuma@gmail.com>, "shilaja madhu" <shilaja.madhu@gmail.com>, "YOGESH MANMODE" <yogesh_manmode@yahoo.com>, "Kavita Markam" <4502238601637916801@mail.orkut.com>, "kavita markam" <kv_markam@indiatimes.com>, "hemu vasudeorao markam" <himanshu1221@gmail.com>, "Amol Naik" <amolnaik4@gmail.com>, "sheetal niwane" <niwane.sheetal@gmail.com>, "vishruti parchake" <vishruti_364@yahoo.co.in>, "bhavi parmar" <bhaviparmar@yahoo.co.in>, "asha pendam" <ashupriti_2006@yahoo.com>, "varsha rane" <a_kubal2000@rediffmail.com>, "asha saraf"
<fanna4dosti@yahoo.co.in>, "SHRIKANT SHELKE" <sd_shelke@licindia.com>, "santu yadav" <santhosh9495@gmail.com>, "appu" <a_bmore@rediffmail.com>, "kashish" <kashish_ma@rediffmail.com>, "kavi" <kavitamarkam@gmail.com>, "khushal" <khushal774@gmail.com>, "chetan" <cdjadhav@gmile.com>, "chetan" <cd_jadhav@yahoo.com>, "ambadekar" <N.R.Ambadekar@gmail.com>, "anthony" <anthonydomnic@gmail.com>, "malkhede" <vlmalkhede@yahoo.co.in>, "ashtekar" <yoganjali20@gmail.com>, "chetna" <chetanamakade@gmail.com>, "atual" <atual_2137123@rediffmail.com>, "haripatil" <haripatil85@gmail.com>, "anil talele" <anil_talele21@yahoo.com>, "manindar" <maninder4443@yahoo.co.in>, "lo" <vijayghongade1445@gmail.com>, "anil" <anilkulkarni79@yahoo.co.in>, "Deepak" <deepaksopori1978@gmail.com>, "Gayatri Karande" <gayatri.karande@gmail.com>, "gaurav" <gaurav_bsnl@yahoo.com>, "ASHA" <ashupriti2006@gmail.com>, "asha" <ashupriti_2006@gmail.com>, kittenmuahuah@yahoo.com, "ponu"
<iti_128@yahoo.com>, pravin_j_masram@yahoo.com, more.aparna@gmail.com, snehal_nagulwar@rediffmail.com, sarangidd@shivaji.com, shailusolanke@gmail.com, bhupendra_chauhan20@rediffmail.com, pgolekar@rediffmail.com, ravimakade@gmail.com, sagar671@gmail.com, "nichat" <prashant_nichat@yahoo.co.in>, "nichat" <prashantnichat@gmail.com>, "saurabh" <saurabhda1982@gmail.com>, "mohan rane" <rane_mohan1310@rediffmail.com>, amoldlandge@yahoo.co.in, sachin@hotmail.com, "mukta" <mukta_nirmal@yahoo.com>, "milind" <milind.bansode@yahoo.co.in>, "nilya" <nile4all@yahoo.com>, "sandesh" <SKANA@gmail.com>, "ravi" <ravi_rdms@yahoo.co.in>, "seema" <see_pim19@yahoo.co.in>, "sanju" <sanju_wath@rediffmail.com>, "sanju" <sanjuwath@yahoo.com>, "tabish" <tabishkhan7@gmail.com>, "tushar" <tusharkulkarni01@yahoo.co.in>, "rupesh" <rupeshbulbake82@yahoo.com>, "pallavi" <pallavi.153@rediffmail.com>, "TTA BSNL" <TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com>, "mohan" <mohansable@yahoo.com>,
yogesh_manmode@rediffmail.com, yogesh.manmode@gmail.com, rahul_sh33@yahoo.com, rahul333666@gmail.com, nile4all@gmail.com
Date: Monday, 15 February, 2010, 11:57 AM

This guy continues to amaze people with his sidewalk 3D chalk drawings.

REGARDS :-
PRAVIN JANRAOJI MASRAM

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

Messages in this topic (2)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
6. please don't go to the court
Posted by: "Deepak Kumar" deepak_bsnlktr@yahoo.com deepak_bsnlktr
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 9:26 pm ((PST))

hi
i request the chq to again think over on going to the court.

First of all, what is the basis of going to the court?
court will not grant u the 2yrs relaxations. the only basis is the recruitment year. but on the same recruitment exam people have joined till 2007 against reserved quota and wait lists. The promotion procedure of the various departments where promotions r done annually like banks and other psu should be examined that they r following the crucial date or not.

Because going to the court to only stay the proceedings and linger it to another two years so as to make the all the non eligible eligible will be a CRIME against the eligible candidates.

Till now every one has prayed for the two years relaxation. Management has given their words for the same. if this exam is not conducted now it will be too late as every one is known of the attitude of NFTE towards this exam.

NOW FOR THE SAKE OF THE UNITY

IT IS CERTAIN THAT THE ELIGIBLE CANDIDATES R GOING TO BE HAVE A CHANCE FOR THEIR PROMOTION FOR WHICH SNATTA FIGHTING FROM THE DAY ONE,IF NO COURT CASE IS DONE.

GOING TO THE COURT DOESN'T GUARANTEE THE ELIGIBILITY FOR NOT ELIGIBLE TO MAKE IT ELIGIBLE BUT GUARANTEES TO MAKE 7YEARS TO 10 YEARS.

THERE IS SHLOKA IN SANSKRIT WHICH MEANS THAT IF ONE GOES TO UNCERTAIN LEAVING THE CERTAIN FOR THEM UNCERTAIN IS UNCERTAIN AND CERTAIN TOO BECOME UNCERTAIN.

AS IT IS CERTAIN THAT THE LEFT OUT CANDIDATES R ELIGIBLE FOR THE NEXT EXAM IF THIS EXAM HELD WITHOUT HINDRANCE, BUT IF IT STOPS THAN GOD KNOWS HOW MANY COURT CASE IT WILL FACE.

REGARDS
Deepak Kumar
9431610399

Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
7a. STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
Posted by: "devendra singh" dksgurdaspur@yahoo.co.uk dksgurdaspur
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:34 pm ((PST))

Very well said SAMPAD,

1-By doing a court case we are going to do the same what management wants i.e. to stop or delay
the process LICE.

2-Not only due to decesion of majority any decesion can be said right.

3- Why CHQ and uneligible cadidates couldn't understand the drawback of courtcase,no one will benifitted and the whole process and effort for JTO LICE will go vein.

DEVENDRA SINGH
GURDASPUR

Messages in this topic (4)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
8. Fw: Re: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
Posted by: "lalit singh" lalitbsingh@yahoo.co.uk lalitbsingh
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:37 pm ((PST))

Dear sampad
Very good example given by u but think if u people come forward for those ineligible majority snattaians and not to be so selfish then i think the story will not be repeated here other wise only god knows what will be happen with this cadre as only ineligiable are not the hurdle and they are only trying for the appearence but think about other hurdle like adhoc jto who will not sit silently and see their carrier spoiling.
Regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)

--- On Tue, 16/2/10, Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, 16
February, 2010, 17:19

Dear Sampad,
Nice to read ur mail. Whatever u r saying thats correct , but , if a stay is asked for only then.
Let me tell you my dear friend that nobody is opting for a stay. What we want is that all should be allowed
to atleast appear in the exam. We all have been recruited in the organisation against the same recruitment year. What change the date of joining is the way the procedure was handled by the particular circles/SSAs.
Some were fast and some slow, coz of which ur and mine joining dates are not same. So for the organisations mistake why should non eligible TTAs lose. Can the management assure with the next exam date? Will it conduct the exam at the earliest? How many vacancies do u expect to be left for non-eligible TTAs . Lets not forget that other than DR also there are other candidates who are eligible for the exam.
Lets be fair. Ofcourse stay should not be asked for , and nobody is going to do that, but let us make all our friends appear the exam.

regards,
Santosh J. Devadiga.
TTA CDMA MSC,
Nasik.
9422268970.

From: sampad_swain2002 <sampad_swain2002@ yahoo.co. in>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Mon, 15 February, 2010 9:58:41 PM
Subject: [TTABSNL] STAY AWAY FROM COMMITTING A HISTORICAL BLUNDER

How Filing a court case for JTO LICE will become a Boomerang decision for all the TTAs.

- It is high time that we should take our decisions very cautiously & patiently with using our intelligence.
- Any marginal error at this niche of time will pull us back again from where we have started our long marathon journey.
- Just learn a lesson from the story of two dogs fighting for a loaf of bread thrown to them. At last not only none of them failed to eat that but also lost their blood by hurting each other & a third person (monkey) was taken away that bread.
- Moral of the above story can be easily understood by everybody.
- Most vital points we should not forget
• Some body is waiting for this type of mistake from our side.
• MT exam postponed due to the various court cases.Every case was there to make the petitioners eligible for the exam subject to the outcome of judgment still the exam was postponed.
- We know
very well that BSNL management is going to conduct this exam forcefully though management has shown his initial hindrance by not stopping the diversion procedure & also very unwilling to reduce the service condition to 7 years.
- If at this time falling under a greed of more & more we will do the court case then there is no doubt that BSNL management & the diversion beneficiaries will take the undue advantages out of that.

SAMPAD KUMAR SWAIN
TTA AXE-10 L-1 TAX CUTTACK
09437066577

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
9. Fw: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........
Posted by: "lalit singh" lalitbsingh@yahoo.co.uk lalitbsingh
Date: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:52 pm ((PST))

dear zuber
Pl. don't question the intigrity of manish. he is doing very nicely and giving his most valuable time for the snatta whole heartedly. as for as manish's eligibility is concern if manish will be eligible at that time also a lot of person are ineligiable and definately court case will come because we will not sit silently and see our carrior spoiling. pl don't divide the snatta based on eligible and ineligiable and pray for our court case sussess so that all ttas having 5 year may appear.
regards
lalit singh
cs up(e)

--- On Wed, 17/2/10, Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Santosh J. Devadiga <sjd_4u@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, 17 February, 2010, 8:13

In that case Zuber you dont know what person Manish is. Pls dont question the integrity of a person like Manish.And let us not draw line between eligible and non-eligible. Lets us try that all the mates are able to appear in the exam
regards,
Santosh J. Devadiga.9422268970.
From: MohammedZuber Sheikh <mgs_zuber197@ yahoo.co. in>
To: TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com
Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 10:24:36 PM
Subject: Re: [TTABSNL] jto lice exam........

Your Mail works best with the New Yahoo Optimized IE8. Get it NOW!.

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage.

Messages in this topic (1)
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
10. Mutual transfer from Maharastra to Rajasthan/Mp/UP/Gj
Posted by: "Mahesh chand Meena" maheshchand.meena@yahoo.com maheshchand.meena
Date: Wed Feb 17, 2010 12:01 am ((PST))

Dear all tta,
it is intimated that i wanna mutual transfer from Maharastra to Raj./MP/UP
if any one want to transfer,pls contact my mail
m13iuc@gmail.com
/ 9413782004

The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/

Messages in this topic (1)

Please visit us at www.SNATTA.org for more details.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TTABSNL/

<*> Your email settings:
Digest Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TTABSNL/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
TTABSNL-normal@yahoogroups.com
TTABSNL-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
TTABSNL-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

------------------------------------------------------------------------

ttabsnl94

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

[TTABSNL] Digest Number 1666

No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

Blog Archive