Hats of to u Nitin ji
Very good presentation & it is very helpfull for all.
Regards
Manish Samadhiya
VP,SNATTA
--- In
TTABSNL@yahoogroups .com, "nitin_pohare" <nitin_pohare@ ...> wrote:
>
>
> After getting calls about The SLP and Diversion Court Case here I am
> trying to give you a Short Review of the matter.
>
>
>
> (I am not Perfect as it is so complicated matter so if I made any
> mistake pl let me know)
>
>
>
> Recruitment Rules -----
>
> 1) Recruitment Rule 1996
>
> 1.50% Direct Recruitment
>
> 2.15% Competitive Exam
>
> 3.35% Screening Qualifying Exam
>
> 4.Education Qualification
>
> 1.degree in Engg with Five Years Regular Service.
>
> 2.High School/Matriculatio n with Six Years Regular Service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 2) Recruitment Rule 1999
>
> 1.50% Direct Recruitment
>
> 2.15% Competitive Exam
>
> 3.35% Screening Qualifying Exam
>
> 4.Education Qualification
>
> 1.Bachelor of Engineering, Bachelor of Technology
>
> 2.OR 3 years diploma
>
> 3.And must posses 10 Years of Regular Service.
>
> Consequences
>
> 1) On dated November 10, 1999 Vacancies of J.T.Os upto August 31, 1999
> were to be filled up as per the Rules of 1996 and the vacancies after
> August 31, 1999 were to be filled up according to the Rules of 1999.
>
>
>
> 2) J.T.Os Screening Test was held on April 23, 2000 and
>
> an undertaking was taken from all the candidates who had
>
> appeared in the test that they would not claim appointments qua
>
> the vacancies available after August 31, 1999 and were filled up from
> the successful candidates still about 6000 candidates were in the
> Waiting List.
>
>
>
> 3) Vide letter dated August 09, 2001 (Annexure P-3), 500 vacancies of
> direct quota were diverted to 35% departmental quota and 500
>
> Candidates of the Waiting List were accommodated in the year
>
> 2001.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 4) In the year 2002,2003, 2004,2005,2006 also 500 vacancies of direct
> quota were diverted to 35% departmental quota and 500 candidates of the
> Waiting List were accommodated
>
> for the last several years
>
>
>
> 5) The posts of J.T.Os of direct quota were being diverted to 35%
>
> departmental quota and the said posts were being filled up from
>
> the Waiting List candidates of the Screening Examination of
>
> J.T.Os held on April 23, 2000.
>
> Explanation: -
>
>
>
> i) 500 seat divert from Direct Quota as no Internal Quota was exists to
> Accommodate these 6000 waitlisted Qualified TTA's,
>
> ii) This process will be continued till 2012 all waitlisted candidates
> will be absorbed in the post of JTO.
>
> iii) Now the 6000 Diverted seats of the Direct Quota needs to be
> restored first so no internal seat/exam will be conducted till
> completion of the same so no internal exam till next 8 years approx. so
> till 2020 no internal exam will be conducted.
>
> In 2020 when the diverted seats will be restored then internal vacancies
> will be counted after the year 2020 and may be in the year 2023 an
> internal exam will be conducted for the vacancies from 2020 to 2023.
>
> HIGH COURT CASE:-
>
> 1)The Exam is Conducted after Sept 1999 with the RR of 1996 where as the
> RR 1999 Should have to be followed and not 1996.
>
> 2)Any Quota Diversion from Internal to External or wise versa is
> illegal.
>
> 3)The person giving the exam in 2001 can not have any right for the
> vacancies generated after 2001.
>
> 4)No person can avail the future generated quota.
>
>
>
> So Court Ordered BSNL to restore the posts diverted from Direct
> Recruitment Quota to 35% Departmental Quota to admit Telecom Technical
> Assistants who had qualified the Screening Test held on April 23, 2000,
> to Direct Recruitment Quota.
>
>
>
> BSNL stopped the Diversion and made a order that 3500 JTO given
> promotion already some of them are SDE now will be accommodated in
> Supernumerary post and not in the Strength of JTO. So our JTO Quota is
> quite safe.
>
>
>
>
>
> (What is Supernumerary ?
>
> Dictionary Says Supernumerary is an additional member of an
> organization. A supernumerary is also non-regular member of a staff, a
> member of the staff or an employee who works in a public office who is
> not part of the manpower complement. Thus, a supernumerary could be an
> extra member or a temporary employee in addition to the permanent staff,
> or permanent members of a society)
>
>
>
> Thus the 500 post Diversion was stopped and there are some chances of
> conduction of Limited Departmental Competitive Exam soon.
>
> JTO(O) Association: -
>
> The left out 2500 out of 6000 so called Qualified TTA's are still in
> JTO Officiating and in a wait for regular promotion of JTO but the said
> diversion was illegal as judgment by Hon High court and hence stopped by
> BSNL , thus these left out TTA's further tried to Challenge the
> order of Hon High Court it in the Supreme Court and mean while trying to
> create pressure on Management and Associations and Union
>
> By all means
>
>
>
> 1. Not to Conduct any Departmental Exam.
>
> 2. Stop the proposal of Service condition reduction from 10 years to
>
> 7/5 years for Departmental JTO exam as passed in NCM.
>
> Further they have demanded to have personnel up gradation of all the
> left out TTAs to JTO as a one time measure.
>
>
>
> These Left-out TTA's made a Association and filled a SLP in Apex
> Court against the High Court Judgement.
>
>
>
> Special Leave Petition:- Under article 136 of the Constitution of
> India, the Supreme Court may, in its discretion, grant special leave to
> appeal from any judgment, decree or order made by any court or tribunal
> in India.
>
>
>
> SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.CCNo 6258-59/2009 OF 2009 filed
>
> Against the Final Order dated 30.5.2008 in C.W.P No 5608 of 2007 and
> Final Order dated 23.1.2009 in Review application Np.442 of 2008 in
> C.W.P No 5608 of 2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at
> Chandigarh
>
>
>
> Once the superior court has disposed of the case before it either way -
> whether the decree or order under appeal is set aside or modified or
> simply confirmed - it is the decree or order of the superior court,
> tribunal or authority which is the final, binding and operative decree
> or order wherein merges the decree or order passed by the court,
> tribunal or authority below.
>
>
>
>
>
> So friends this is a Final Battle to be WIN.
>
> GET UNITED AND MAKE SNATTA STRONG……
>
>
>
> With Regards..... ..
>
> Nitin Pohare
>
> Nashik , Maharashtra. .(9422279640)
>
............
No comments:
Post a Comment